Thursday, December 13, 2012

Help needed with revising essay:)

Amanda Paulhus
12-13-12
Period B
 Feminist critique
                        Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter through a feminist lens
            A feminist lens used to analyze Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter reveals that men and women can have exchanged roles in both society and home life through Hester Prynne and Dimmesdale. In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne is a single mother who raises a child on her own. The father of the baby is unknown to others in the town and Hester is ridiculed for it. The father does not take on a role in Hester’s family life but he does portray an important role in society. Nathaniel Hawthorne shows an appreciation for women through his determination of Hester Prynne’s role in society. Nina Baym writes about Hester Prynne’s role in The Scarlet Letter as well as her duality with feminism. Mark Richard Barna writes as a synopsis explanation of how Hester’s sin is unpardonable, as presented in the novel. Millicent Bell explains Hester’s situation as a prophecy and explains reasoning for the outcome. In a feminist lens, Nathaniel Hawthorne explores Hester’s situation with a feminist view in order to portray that both men and women can take on vital roles in society that go against typical stereotypes.
            Through a feminist lens, it is expressed that Hester Prynne’s role is a contrast with stereotypical women. Hester Prynne does not carry shame with her possession of the scarlet letter, something known as a burden in the Puritan society. Hester thinks of “her letter as a badge of honor instead of a mark of negation” (Baym 1). Wearing the scarlet letter in pride is an anomaly during the Puritan society because it is a symbol for adultery. Because she is a woman her commitment of adultery is more highly frowned upon in the town. Hester changes a symbol of shame to a beautiful symbol she “converted the letter into her own statement by fantastic flourishes of gold embroidery…so that it looks like a badge of honor while it reinforces her condemnation” (Bell 1). If she had been shameful, as she was supposed to be, of her sin she would be controlled by it and not respected in society. She sets an example for the town and publicly reinforces her true innocence. She manages to gain respect because of her pride and self-respect in despite of her mistake. Hester’s ability to take honor away from a symbol of such treachery shows she “is a model and a counterstatement” (Baym 1). Hester carries pride for her sin in town throughout a struggle to gain respect from everyone in society. She is indeed a counterstatement because she does the opposite of what one who wears the scarlet letter is supposed to do. Although Hester was publically humiliated she had “no wish of gaining anything” (Hawthorne 147).  She plays a fitful role through society and serves as a catalyst changes people in the town even though she had no wish of doing so. She simply wanted to raise her daughter Pearl and stay able to do so. Considering she feels this way, she is truly portrayed as a model. Her capability to not give into stereotypes is conclusive that she is a role model for women during this puritan era.
            Hester Prynne’s sin is portrayed as unpardonable even though she expresses a non stereotypical response. Mark Richard Barna explains the importance of this in his article Nathaniel Hawthorne and the unpardonable sin. Hester Prynne’s choice to commit adultery is unpardonable because of her puritan religion but, given her situation Hawthorne feels a “deep sadness tinged with sympathy for the human condition” (Barna 1). Hawthorne writes Hester as a single mother but gives herself respect and shows that he has a respect for women in his life. During the 1600’s, the setting in which The Scarlet Letter was written, this type of sin was far more so judged than in today’s systems. It is though that it is possible that people are “born into the world with a tendency to sin” (Barna 1). Because babies are born into the world with no perception of what it is like or how to do things they are apt to sin because they are unaware of what is sin and what is right. Mark Richard Barna is basically trying to defend Hester because she did not know right from wrong in her situation. Woman are not given the same respect in society during the 1600’s as they are now with “a tendency to speculation, though it may keep woman quiet” they were found inferior to men and punished differently (Hawthorne152).Nathaniel Hawthorne contrasts the punishments of men and woman and explains that society needs “to be torn down” and created equal for man and woman. Hawthorne’s respect for women is shown through Hester’s characteristics.
          Hester now has to play both the role of a typical mother and a father; she is evidence that stereotypes are incorrect. She was “alone in the world…and with little Pearl to be guided and protected” she had to take on an opposing role in order to raise her child (Hawthorne 150). She is a respite from stereotypical women. She goes through the most hardship and has “never put forward even the humblest title to share in the world’s privileges” (Hawthorne 147). She has no hope of gaining privilege but a hope of gaining respect and showmanship for raising her daughter. Hester was able to provide for her child even though her situation was undesirable and she had no father for Pearl. In giving her this ability Nathaniel Hawthorne shows a further respect for women and their abilities as well as their strength. Hester is a philanthropic character and she entails a condemnation she will never escape but, she still feels love for the people around her and wants to help them. Hester was “hopeless of retrieving her position” (Hawthorne 150). She wanted to be able to provide everything for Pearl, and she did. She gave up everything for her, alike to the Pearl of Great price that a man gave away everything for this pearl. Hester is considered an “Adulterous heroine” because she saves her daughter from a life of hardship (Bell 2). She set an example for women in the town and represents a new awakening of pride for women. She is very distraught from the way of other people in town because they are firm believers of the puritan religion as was Hester but she now sees the fault in puritan law.
            There are many allusions in The Scarlet Letter that allude to feminist figures. There is an allusion to Adam and Eve which presents Hester as Eve.  “…the infant was worthy to be brought forth in Eden…after the world’s first parents were driven out” (Hawthorne 86).Hester is symbolically compared to Eve. Since both Eve and Hester committed a sin, they were both punished. This is symbolic because Eve and Hester both have children born from sin. Although allusion is lacking in use, the way it is used essentially shapes the opinion of the reader and how they chose to view Hester as a person. Through a feminist lens, Hester is created in the image of the first mother, Eve, who is an important allusion in religion.
            Through a feminist lens, Nathaniel Hawthorne presents the interchangeable roles of women and men in his novel The Scarlet Letter. The aforementioned quotations explain how Hester Prynne is evidence of the ability of women and men to take on one another’s roles in society. Nathaniel Hawthorne presents respect for Hester Prynne from the moment her sin is known. Nina Baym, Millicent Bell, and Mark Richard Barna substantiate that Hester represents the reality that men and women have the same ability to play roles in society and that they are interchangeable. The solution to the vilification in The Scarlet Letter is presented multiple times throughout the course of Hester and Pearl’s life but the final solution is the end for minister Dimmesdale and the death of Chillingworth, Hester’s husband. Hester later returns to the cottage years later. The fact that Hester Prynne survives her sin and her partner in crime, minister Dimmesdale does not shows Nathaniel Hawthorne’s respect for women. If Hester had dies and the men had lived Hawthorne’s beliefs would have been compromised.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Future

Future
Many years ago
Id dreamt
About where we all would go
When the future comes
Where do we all go?

One day I decided to
Create a machine that would take me to
The future

When I opened the door
I saw something I’d never before
My dreams were alive
I could see and feel them subside

The rhythm of life has truly changed
All the people were so strange
They all wore blue and yellow shoes
They all ate cats and played kazoos

I walked around merely looking for fun
My man was there and she told me sum
She told me the story of how
I took her there
In my machine of timely scare
Many times ago she stared
My life had come in gone I stared
She opened her arms and soon I saw
Now people had no arms
Just claws
No wishing
No hoping
I held on close to my mind coping
I ran to my machine and hopped in
To close my eyes
Shut and tearing’
As I reached for the lever I realized…
I’m in bed now
Where did it all go?
Where do we all go? X3



The history of Red







In Linda Hogan’s Poem “The History of Red” there is duality encased within the dynamic nature of red. This is because when one wonders of the color red they ponder death and blood, merely destruction or creation. Hogan starts the poem in complete darkness, mentioning black as the only color; then she digresses away from the darkness to a new life or red “creation”.  This is a symbolic motif because red is a reoccurring theme but the symbolism changes in each example. The dynamic nature of “red” in this poem is necessary in order to portray the universal idea; because without having this duality between two concepts being conveyed the universal idea wouldn’t be strong.  The universal idea communicated through this poem is that the color red itself does not simply serve to imply or show one meaning or mood; because red can represent creation or destruction, as aforementioned. The color red is shown as magmatic of creation in line 19 which says, “Wearing the red, wet mask of birth,” But, red is also shown as ravaging in lines such as; line 28 “red is the fear”, line 46 “they divined the red shadows of leeches”, line 58 “as the red feather of war” and line 61 “and red was the soldier”.  Thus, the overall universal idea serves to explain that although red usually is associated with death and despair it can also be associated with happiness and joy.

My song creation:Far


FAR

So close to me

Yet so far away,

So close I see

But I can’t see your face,

When you’re so far away

I don’t know how to say this;

I love you



You’re in the Atlantic…

Ocean

And I’m here floating in the Pacific Ocean

Looking for you



And you’re like Africa

Always looking for some new way to stay

To stay X2

And I’m like the Galapagos

Separated by the water

That creates new creations



And were are a cloud filled sky

Awaiting a storm that will not die

I look up and see reflections,

Of my heart

In the nights rains and tears

Oh so many times

I’ve felt the worlds collide



So close to me

Yet so far away,

So close I see

But I can’t see your face,

When you’re so far away

I don’t know how to say this;

I love you



Backmasking and reverse speech

In my opinion, backmasking and speech reverse are two completely controversial ideas. Backmasking is simply playing a message backwards that is meant to be played forward. Backmasking does not require any knowledge or purpose because if you play anything backwards it is backmasking.This idea is good and all but the hidden message is never intentional  in his context, unlike reverse speech.
The idea of reverse speech is the same type of idea that; subconsciously, humans speak in a forward manner but the language is bi-level and contains a second message when reversed. Reverse speech implies that humans have a greater understanding of theses words and how they sound in reverse in order to portray some hidden idea or concept. This is brought up in many conspiracies and debates about such things. This concept is harder to follow or understand than backmasking because there is so much more to it.
    There are many accusations of backmasking and reverse speech in songs that allude to satin. This includes “break on through” by The Doors that originally says “ treasure’s there” which in reverse says “I am Satan”. This is interesting because the original song has nothing to do with satan and that is why one could ponder that it is a secret hidden message. I can hear the reverse clearly which doesn't completely sway my opinion but  one could think it is more so than others that you can hardly make out what is supposedly being said such as in Lady Gaga’s song “Paparazzi”  which I can hardly tell what is being said but it is supposed to say (reversed) “Evil save us! These stars above, above... we model it on the arts of Lucifer.” I do not agree that this is backmasking because the words are not coherent enough to tell. An example i really appreciated was Hotel California because I personally know this song well and the eagles supposedly had the hidden message of “ Satan he hears this. He had me believe in him.” which seems so peculiar to me. This reverse along with the one for “Paparzzi” were hard to figure out.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Classwork : Pink Floyd VS Boston

“Rock n’ rolls band” by Boston                                  
Tone- reminiscent
3 devices:
Local color
-“dancing’ in the streets of Hyannis”
-“playing’ for a week in Rhode Island”
- “just another band out of Boston”
Imagery
-“everybody’s waiting’\ getting’ crazy”
-“people stood in line”
-“on the car radio”
Characterization
-“he smoked a big cigar”
-“playing all the bars”
-“sleeping in our cars”
-“we barely made enough to survive”









“Have a cigar” by Pink Floyd
Tone- dogmatic
3 devices:
Hyperbole:
-“I’ve always had deep respect”
-“which ones Pink?”
-“riding the gravy train”
-so happy we can hardly count”
-“everybody else is just green”
“You’re never gonna die”
Characterization:
-“have a cigar”
-“if we pull together as a team”
-we’re just knocked out”
Point of view:
-“you’re gonna go far”

Jack Johnson's "Monsoon"

                                                Amanda Paulhus
                                                                                                                                                3/23/11

Making ironic comparisons in his song “Monsoon”, Jack Johnson combines naturalistic hyperbole, personifying imagery, and playful pun in order to share his idea that “time never waits”.
Hyperbole, an exaggeration made for effect, is used often in pieces of music. Jack Johnson utilizes hyperbole that pertains to nature in his song “Monsoon”.  Johnson creates hyperbole when he sings “if the moon / can turn the tides it can pull the tears/ and take them from our eyes”. This hyperbole exaggerates how the moons presence changes the tides in saying it can do more; because this is personifying the moon, a piece of nature. Johnson also uses hyperbole as a paradox when he says “focusing on nothing so now everything is clear”; because nothing and everything are contradictory. Jack exaggerates life when he sings “all of life/ is in one drop of the ocean”. In this line he makes a derogatory exaggeration in saying that something as large as “all of life” could be held in something so small as ‘one drop of the ocean”. Though his use of hyperbole is lacking it is still an important aspect of the song.
Imagery is language that evokes sensory images. Johnson combines imagery that pertains to both sight and hearing in his song “Monsoon”. He appeals to ones hearing sense when singing “sonny do you hear the sound” because this causes you to picture either the two people having a conversation or the sound itself.  When Johnson uses both hyperbole and personification with “the moon “it creates imagery of “the moon [turning] the tides” and “[pulling] the tears /from our eyes”. These instances also create natural imagery of the ocean and the tides rolling in. Jack creates subtle imagery of someone walking “in amazement stumbling through the day” and this idea of the person seeming to be “waiting to go home”. The imagery throughout the song changes continuously.
The manipulation of words to create clever relationships between language and ideas is wordplay. Pun, a play on words in which multiple interpretations of a given word are possible, is used along with wordplay in Jack Johnson’s song “Monsoon”. Pun and wordplay are used often together.  The one pun Johnson uses throughout the song is “monsoon-er” because it sounds as if he were saying soon. Another instance of wordplay is when John sings “show me that there’s more than the mean time”. “Mean time” is a pun because time itself cannot be mean or rude.  Though pun is not used all that much in his song, Johnson made a god attempt and the wordplay truly adds to the meaning of his song “monsoon”.
Jack Johnson uses many literary devices in his song “Monsoon” In order to portray his true ideas. Making ironic comparisons in his song “Monsoon”, Jack Johnson combines naturalistic hyperbole, personifying imagery, and playful pun in order to share his idea that “time never waits”.